Large restaurants raise discounts to fend off Swiggy, Zomato

admin

August 3, 2022

Written By Ratna Bhushan

Large restaurants have increased the amount of discounts and promotional offers by 15-20% on their own apps compared with those offered by aggregators Swiggy and Zomato, to offset steep commissions and search optimisation fees being charged by the aggregators and reduce the dependence on them, industry executives said.

India’s largest quick service chain, Domino’s Pizza which operates 1,625 outlets, launched multiple “free rewards offers” on its own app last weekend, across delivery, takeaway and dine-ins.

While Zomato and Swiggy charge commissions of 15-30% on every order, new tech platforms like ThriveNow and Google-backed DotPe levy only 3-5%. These food tech platforms allow restaurants to set up their own digital services.

Domino’s, McDonald’s, Social, Punjab Grill, deGustibus Hospitality, Street Foods of India, Wow!Momo and Pizza Hut are among the ones offering higher discounts on their own apps.

For large brands, orders from their own apps are averaging anywhere between 10% and 25%, though smaller ones are still relying heavily on the aggregators for scale, executives said.

“Our focus is to increase promotions and give more value through our own delivery platforms to entice customers to transact and reduce dependence on more expensive aggregators,” said Rohit Aggarwal, director at Lite Bite Foods, which operates Punjab Grill, Artful Baker and YouMee. He said close to 20% of the company’s delivery business was now through its own platforms.

Executives said the relationship between restaurants and aggregators involved both a huge benefit and cost.

“There’s the inherent benefit which restaurants reap from the aggregators in terms of scale and last-mile delivery, specially for the mid-sized restaurants which don’t have the budgets to set up their own deliveries. But the restaurants are also dealing with the very steep cost of commissions,” said Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of retail consultancy Third Eyesight.

Some brands that offer direct deliveries are also focusing on the nascent but emerging subscription-based meal services and menu customisation.

“It is extremely important for restaurants to take back some control of their digital landscape, rather than being totally dependent on the aggregators. This will not only save them huge delivery costs but also give them access to more customer data; aggregators have thrived on discounts, which is funded almost entirely by the restaurants,” said Anurag Katriar, chief executive of Indigo Hospitality.

In addition to third-party delivery operators such as Dunzo and Shadowfax, which work either through logistics aggregators or directly with the restaurants, brands are also delivering through their own fleet.

Riyaaz Amlani, chief executive at Impresario Handmade Restaurants, which runs Social, Smoke House Deli and Salt Water Cafe, said: “We are offering the best price on our own platforms and our discounts are in the range of 20-25%.”

For large brands, orders from their own apps are anywhere between 10% and 25%, though smaller ones are still relying heavily on the aggregators for scale, executives said.

In addition to third-party delivery operators such as Dunzo or Shadowfax which work either through logistics aggregators or directly with the restaurants, brands are also delivering through their own fleet. Some that offer direct deliveries said they were also focusing on the nascent but emerging subscription-based meal services and menu customisation.

Mid last year, over a dozen large restaurant chains had collaborated to start a #OrderDirect movement, amid escalation of a long-standing tussle between restaurants and aggregators. The food services chains alleged that aggregators charged steep commissions and masked critical customer data.

According to estimates by the National Restaurant Association of India, the annual food services market in India is of about Rs 4.2 lakh crore and could grow to Rs 7.7 lakh crore by 2025.

India’s largest quick service chain, Domino’s Pizza which operates 1,625 outlets, launched multiple “free rewards offers” on its own app last weekend, across delivery, takeaway and dine-ins.

While Zomato and Swiggy charge commissions of 15-30% on every order, new tech platforms like ThriveNow and Google-backed DotPe levy only 3-5%. These food tech platforms allow restaurants to set up their own digital services.

“We’ve grown 40% this quarter over the previous quarter, enabling restaurants to set up their own direct ordering platform; we expect to see further escalation in demand in the upcoming festive season,” said Dhruv Dewan, cofounder at Hashtag Loyalty, which operates ThriveNow.

Jubilant Foodworks, the master franchise for Domino’s Pizza in India, had acquired a 35% stake Hashtag Loyalty late last year.

Thrive charges a 5% commission and is working to increase its scale from 11,300 restaurants at present, Dewan said.

Domino’s, McDonald’s, Social, Punjab Grill, deGustibus Hospitality, Street Foods of India, Wow!Momo and Pizza Hut are among the ones offering higher discounts on their own apps.

For large brands, orders from their own apps are averaging anywhere between 10% and 25%, though smaller ones are still relying heavily on the aggregators for scale, executives said.

“Our focus is to increase promotions and give more value through our own delivery platforms to entice customers to transact and reduce dependence on more expensive aggregators,” said Rohit Aggarwal, director at Lite Bite Foods, which operates Punjab Grill, Artful Baker and YouMee. He said close to 20% of the company’s delivery business was now through its own platforms.

Executives said the relationship between restaurants and aggregators involved both a huge benefit and cost. “ .

“There’s the inherent benefit which restaurants reap from the aggregators in terms of scale and last-mile delivery, specially for the mid-sized restaurants which don’t have the budgets to set up their own deliveries. But the restaurants are also dealing with the very steep cost of commissions,” said Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of retail consultancy Third Eyesight.

Some brands that offer direct deliveries are also focusing on the nascent but emerging subscription-based meal services .

“It is extremely important for restaurants to take back some control of their digital landscape, rather than being totally dependent on the aggregators. This will not only save them huge delivery costs but also give them access to more customer data; aggregators have thrived on discounts, which is funded almost entirely by the restaurants,” said Anurag Katriar, chief executive of Indigo Hospitality.

In addition to third-party delivery operators such as Dunzo and Shadowfax, which work either through logistics aggregators or directly with the restaurants, brands are also delivering through their own fleet.

Riyaaz Amlani, chief executive at Impresario Handmade Restaurants, which runs Social, Smoke House Deli and Salt Water Cafe, said: “We are offering the best price on our own platforms and our discounts are in the range of 20-25%.”

For large brands, orders from their own apps are anywhere between 10% and 25%, though smaller ones are still relying heavily on the aggregators for scale, executives said.

In addition to third-party delivery operators such as Dunzo or Shadowfax which work either through logistics aggregators or directly with the restaurants, brands are also delivering through their own fleet. Some that offer direct deliveries said they were also focusing on the nascent but emerging subscription-based me .

Mid last year, over a dozen large restaurant chains had collaborated to start a #OrderDirect movement, amid escalation of a long-standing tussle between restaurants and aggregators. The food services chains alleged that aggregators charged steep commissions and masked critical customer data.

According to estimates by the National Restaurant Association of India, the annual food services market in India is of about Rs 4.2 lakh crore and could grow to Rs 7.7 lakh crore by 2025.

Source: economictimes

Pret A Manger-Reliance tie-up to force Indian café chains to smell the coffee

admin

July 27, 2022

Written ByAlakananda Chakraborty

Brand’s positioning may be just below Starbucks

It is against this background that Reliance Brands (RBL) announced its strategic partnership with global fresh food and organic coffee chain, Pret A Manger (PAM).

By Alokananda Chakraborty

India may boast of the presence of several marquee international coffee chains, but none of them, with the possible exception of Starbucks, have been able to make much of an impact. The reasons are obvious; for one, India is largely a tea-drinking market, with coffee penetration still at just about 11%. Coffee remains largely an in-home consumption drink. Then there are the usual challenges of getting prime real estate at a reasonable cost and consumers’ capacity to pay. The pandemic, which disrupted food supply chains and the overall demand, delivered a body blow, leading to shutdown of around 8% of the outlets during 2021.

It is against this background that Reliance Brands (RBL) announced its strategic partnership with global fresh food and organic coffee chain, Pret A Manger (PAM). The first store will open by the end of this financial year. While RBL is tight-lipped about the pricing or positioning strategy, experts say PAM’s biggest advantage is its association with Reliance.

“PAM is a late entrant and would have been at a huge disadvantage if it went alone,” says Anthony Dsouza, executive director & country service line leader, innovation, Ipsos India.

So what does Reliance brings to the table? “Significant investment capability, real estate strength and know-how of retail. These could lead to a much higher scalability and access to the right locations,” says Angshuman Bhattacharya, national leader, consumer product and retail sector, EY India. “However, running a café chain also involves building out the right supply chains across the country, which the brand would need to build,” he adds.

Bhattacharya is bang on. The success of an F&B franchise business depends on getting real estate at the right price. Reliance can offer a tremendous advantage here to PAM. Not only does it run a very large retail business, it also owns malls.

Experts say a lot would also depend on the right pricing. Pramod Damodaran, who had relaunched Costa Coffee India in his earlier stint as COO for that firm, and is now CEO of Wagh Bakri Tea Lounge, says, “There’s a big space between the 240 and170 for a cup of cappuccino, that is, just below the Starbucks/Costa Coffees of the world.”

PAM will probably occupy that window – it is unlikely to be a premium offering for two reasons. One, PAM is primarily a sandwich chain in the UK and it’s not clear how much premium it can command for a pre-made sandwich. Two, if PAM were to take advantage of the retail footprint of Reliance and were to follow a shop-in-shop format, say, in a Reliance Trends store, it can’t afford to be premium. The positioning would be a consequence of that captive audience.

In other words, the store location will, to a large extent, determine both the pricing and positioning of PAM. Agrees Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of Third Eyesight, a specialist management consulting firm: “At the end of the day, PAM is more a quick service outlet than a cafe. (Pret A Manger means “ready to eat” in French). And the consistency of its offering comes from what is called the pre-prep.”

All PAM outlets in the UK follow the concept of “freshness of ingredients” and “quickness of service”. The hero product – the sandwich in this case – is still a convenience food, a grab-and-go item. It is prepared by a central commissary or multiple commissaries and is at the most heated or packaged at the counter. “So it is not a restaurant and it can’t charge a restaurant price,” says Dutta.

In a sense, Domino’s has perfected this model with a lot of pre-prep done at the commissary end but the actual pizza is prepared “at location” or in the store. “In this case (PAM), you are not doing that volume of work at the consumer-facing counter,” Dutta adds. And if that is the model RBL plans to replicate in the country, the positioning, by default, is mass.

“The PAM-Reliance combination is likely to be a mass market offer, with value pricing and highly localised strategy,” Dsouza of Ipsos says.

But mass or premium positioning, PAM’s entry will no doubt roil the waters. “Incumbents have to up the food game if they want to take on the might of Reliance,” says an executive with a rival brand. Beverages form a dominant part of the café industry sales. Besides food and beverages, merchandising, which is employed largely for branding, is rapidly becoming a source of additional revenue. About 60-65% of café sales come from beverages, followed by food which forms about 20-25% and about 10% from merchandise.

For one, Tata Starbucks, which witnessed a 76% growth and logged `636 crore revenue in FY22, has been working at its food menu and delivery for some time. In a recent interview to FE BrandWagon, Sushant Dash, CEO, Tata Starbucks, had said that the brand had to “re-prioritise” because of the pandemic, with innovation becoming more important to keep the brand relevant. Starbucks innovated with the menu to keep the interest level up among customers and introduced new food items and gave the existing food items an Indian twist,” he had said.

Earlier this month, Starbucks added masala chai, filter coffee and an array of bite-sized snacks and sandwiches to its menu card. Its new milkshakes will be priced starting at 275, while masala chai and filter coffee will start from190. It also introduced the ‘Picco’ – meaning ‘small’ in Italian – starting at `185.

Will that be enough? Given PAM’s strong presence in the food space, there is no denying that existing café chains in India have to tweak their food menu considerably. In other words, they will have to get out of their comfort zones.

Source: financialexpress

Beauty on-demand: Ironing out the wrinkles

admin

July 24, 2022

Written By Akanksha Nagar

Urban Company aims to bring quality, innovation and affordability to the unorganised beauty services market

As the pandemic started hammering the business, a sizeable number of beauty professionals who worked at salons jumped onto the up and coming tech-enabled home services marketplaces.

The bulk of the Indian beauty services industry remains unorganised and fragmented, dominated by expensive salon brands or small players that offer dubious products, inconsistent service and unsolicited advice. With a push from the pandemic-led restrictions, there has been a sudden rise of a clutch of organised, on-demand players that offer professional beauty care services in situ. Urban Company, for one, has witnessed a big rise in service calls in recent months, driven by rising aspiration levels and disposable income, and the growing demand for standardised and safe in-home services. The segment contributes over 40% of the total revenue for the company already. As per published documents, the firm posted a 13.8% increase in revenue from operations to `239 crore in FY21 compared to `210 crore in FY20.

According to Expert Market Research report, the Indian beauty and personal care industry attained a value of `54,558 crore in 2020, and is set to grow at a CAGR of 11% in the 2022-27 period. Of this, the Indian salon market, which stood at `55,000 crore in FY20, is expected to touch a whopping `2 trillion in FY25, at a CAGR of 28%.

Numbers aside, the spread of the Covid pandemic forced the industry to switch to reverse gear as many salons shut down permanently or closed down unviable outlets just to stay afloat. Enrich Beauty which had salons in cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore and Ahmedabad, for instance, shut down five salons since 2020, bringing the total count down to 83.

As the pandemic started hammering the business, a sizeable number of beauty professionals who worked at salons jumped onto the up and coming tech-enabled home services marketplaces. Says Anand Ramanathan, partner, Deloitte India, “Service aggregator marketplaces have helped increase organisation and bring standardisation in delivery.” It was a win-win for both the customer and the brand. Brands could directly engage with the end consumers and the customer was assured quality—of both the products used and the services rendered.

Mukund Kulashekaran, chief business officer, Urban Company, says the fundamental shift in the beauty service market has been in terms of improved quality. As long as the market remained fragmented, there was zero investment in training or upgradation of services, or in product innovation. None of the small regional players really had the wherewithal to take that leap.

Focus on quality

Urban Company devoted a lot of time and attention to training the service providers while also pursuing innovations to raise the standard of the products on offer. While it uses a number of high-end brands, it has also begun to develop its own to make its services more accessible and compete on a larger scale. It operates three levels of salons: the luxury (average ticket size `2,500), the mid-mass premium (`1,200), and the classic, which is at the economy end of the spectrum (`750) and uses proprietary products for the classic and mid-mass premium segments.

Quality is assured by continuous testing and keeping a sharp eye on customer feedback. There is also significant investment in training and automation. It currently has an in-house team of over 200 full-time trainers across 50 cities. It is stepping up investments in technology to both improve product quality and to act promptly on feedback.

The firm had introduced in-home hair and nail services for women amid the pandemic, which, Kulashekaran says, has scaled quite well. Demand for men’s salon services, launched right before the pandemic, has increased from 20,000 transactions pre-pandemic to as high as 150,000 transactions per month. It launched a Skin Clinic for laser and advanced facials in seven cities and has signed on more than two million clients already.

In terms of geographical spread, while the top ten cities account for more than 80% of its revenue, non-metros are rising fast in terms of revenue share.

Long haul

The company prioritises brand-related communication rather than performance-related. The focus is more on the video medium than the click-through media. So the focus area is TV, but YouTube in case of a targeted campaign.

In the next stage of expansion its communication strategy will be key. Jagdeep Kapoor, founder, chairman and MD, Samsika Marketing Consultants, says that while expanding beyond metros the brand has to be less urban in terms of perception and imagery and take into account the culture and taboos, and the differing definition of beauty.

Samit Sinha, managing partner, Alchemist Brand Consulting, says to keep up the pace of growth the brand has to invest in its service providers, and not just its customers. This is a business model that will not be difficult to replicate. The trick will be to incentivise the beauty care technicians so that they are able to offer high-quality services to the customer and have little reason to join a rival brand. The thing to remember: Like most other service businesses, beauticians too can bypass the company and establish direct relationships with customers — a phenomenon that has plagued the ride hailing and ride share services in India.

BOX: Staying on track (Insights from Devangshu Dutta, CEO, Third Eyesight)

Three factors that will determine success

• The customer sees the aggregation platform as the “provider” of service, rather than a listing agency. So the company needs to totally own the customer experience, end-to-end.

• Ensuring quality of service consistently is the biggest enabler for growth.

• Over time, UC has moved to this “ownership” of the experience, which does mean additional investment, but also pays off in the end.

Three factors that might undo the good work:

• If it doesn’t keep working on customer experience ownership, it could slip

• Margins/commissions need to be reasonable, otherwise, service professionals may abandon the platform

• Given the high customer acquisition costs, it has to drive repeats rather than one-time or low-frequency purchases.

Source: financialexpress

Reliance to launch British sandwich outlet Pret A Manger in India

admin

June 30, 2022

Written By Aditya Kalra & Abhirup Roy

MUMBAI, June 30 (Reuters) – Reliance Industries (RELI.NS) said on Thursday it would open outlets of Pret A Manger in India under a franchise deal with the British sandwich and coffee chain, a first foray by the Indian firm in the country’s growing food and beverage industry.

Reliance Brands Ltd (RBL), a unit of the conglomerate that also runs India’s biggest retail chain, would start by opening branches of Pret, as the brand is known in Britain, in big Indian cities, both companies said.

RBL Chief Executive Darshan Mehta said in joint statement the partnership was “rooted in the strong growth potential” of the Pret brand, known for its organic coffee and upmarket sandwiches, and the Indian food and beverage industry.

The first outlet would open in Mumbai before March 2023 and India was expected to become one of Pret’s top three markets in three years, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters.

Pret A Manger, whose name means “ready to eat” in French, first opened in London in 1986. It now has 550 outlets globally, including in the United States and several European states. It is owned by investment group JAB and founder Sinclair Beecham.

In India, the brand will compete with Starbucks (SBUX.O), which has a joint venture with India’s Tata, and Costa Coffee, which is owned by Coca-Cola (KO.N).

Mukesh Ambani, one India’s richest men, runs Reliance, which has more than 2,000 supermarkets and grocery stores in India. Reliance also has partnerships with luxury brands, such as Burberry and Jimmy Choo.

“Reliance wants to look at retail in all its shapes and forms. Over time, they’ve realised partnerships are the way for business formats that may be difficult or slower to crack,” said Devangshu Dutta, head of retail consultancy firm Third Eyesight.

Source: reuters

Top companies lead charge in retail’s expansion push

admin

June 24, 2022

Written By Mukherjee, ET Bureau

Top listed retail chains such as Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail, Avenue Supermarts and Tata-owned Trent are going to lead store additions through the next financial year, as they double down on expansion after the pandemic, company executives and analysts said.

As per a recent report by ICICI Securities, 16.7 million square feet of retail space would be added by eight large, listed retail chains between FY21 and FY24 as compared to 8 million square feet added in the preceding four years of FY18-21. These companies also include Titan, Bata, V-Mart, TCNS and Shoppers Stop.


The buoyed sentiment comes after the recovery of retailers to more than their pre-Covid levels in the last two quarters, and is also driven by pentup demand, strong sales despite increasing prices and expansion into small-tier towns, the report said. There has been an expansion of the market which is happening along with a consolidation, said Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of consulting firm Third Eyesight. “Not all locations might turn out to be viable, but in every expansion cycle there are boom and bust. And the bust is not as big as the boom. Right now, we are in the expansion cycle,” he said.

Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail managing director Ashish Dikshit told analysts recently that the company would expand rapidly since plans were held up in the last two years due to the pandemic, with faster growth for fashion business, ethnic wear and inner wear. The company, which had raised ₹2,195 crore from GIC Singapore, intends to invest ₹600-800 crore for expansion in the next couple of years.

“…we continued to believe both in the long-term growth potential of the market and intrinsic strength of our brands and we feel now the time is to accelerate to catch up on what we have not done over the last 12 to 18 months and I would go back almost till the beginning of the Covid period from 18 to 24 months where some of our growth initiatives have held back,” said Dikshit.

As per the ICICI report, Avenue Supermarts would add 7.5 million sq ft during FY21-24 for the DMart stores as compared to 3.9 million sq ft added in FY18-21. Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail would add 3.1 million sq ft as compared to 1.2 million sq ft in preceding four years, while, among others, Trent would add 2.7 million sq ft (vs 1.5 million sq ft), Shoppers Stop would add 0.8 million sq ft (0.2 million sq ft) and Bata would add 0.7 million sq ft (0.2 million sq ft).

India’s largest retailer, Reliance Retail, too has accelerated expansion plans including taking its stores into new geographies, Gaurav Jain, head of strategy and business development told analysts recently.

Source: economictimes