admin
January 14, 2011
MUMBAI,
14 January, 2011, Business Standard
Starbucks is finally coming to India. The world’s largest premium coffee retail chain today announced that it has entered into an agreement with Tata Coffee for a strategic alliance.
Under a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MoU), Starbucks will explore setting up stores in the Tata group’s retail outlets and hotels, besides sourcing and roasting coffee beans at Tata Coffee’s Kodagu facility.
Tata Coffee, one of the biggest suppliers of Arabica coffee beans, has shipped coffee beans to Starbucks in the past and is now building a structure for a long-term relationship, a joint release from the Tata group and Starbucks.
Starbucks, which runs over 16,000 stores worldwide, has been in talks with the Future Group, Reliance and Jubilant for an entry into India, but none of those discussions fructified.
Retail growth outside the US is now central to the company’s strategy. In an investor presentation, Starbucks International President John Culver said the company hopes to operate at least 1,500 stores in mainland China by 2015. He also said that the company sees exciting growth prospects in other emerging countries such as India and Brazil.
According to the MoU, the two companies will collaborate on providing training to local farmers, technicians and agronomists to improve coffee-growing and milling skills. The two companies will also explore social projects in the coffee-growing regions Tata Coffee operates.
R K Krishna Kumar, Chairman of Tata Coffee, told Business Standard that the first Starbucks outlet could open in the next six to seven months. He said there is no exclusive arrangement with Starbucks at the moment.
One of the hurdles that the two companies have to sort out is Starbucks’ franchisee-led business model — something Tata is uncomfortable with. “It’s up to Starbucks to decide what kind of a sustainable partner they are looking at and what will be the shared values,” Krishna Kumar said.
“This MoU is the first step in our entry to India. We are focused on exploring local sourcing and roasting opportunities with the thousands of coffee farmers within the Tata ecosystem. We believe India can be an important source for coffee in the domestic market, as well as across the many regions globally where Starbucks has operations,’’ said Howard Schultz, chairman, president & CEO, Starbucks Coffee Company.
In the areas of sourcing and roasting, Starbucks will explore procuring green coffee from Tata Coffee estates and roasting at the Indian company’s existing facilities. At a later phase, Tata Coffee and Starbucks will consider jointly investing in additional facilities and roasting green coffee for export, the release said.
Headquartered in Seattle, Washington, Starbucks operates in more than 50 countries. It has been sourcing coffee beans from India for the last seven years.
Tata Coffee is Asia’s largest coffee plantation company and the third-largest exporter of instant coffee in the country. It produces more than 10,000 million tonne of shade grown Arabica and Robusta coffees at its 19 estates in south India. Its two instant coffee manufacturing facilities have a combined installed capacity of 6,000 tonne.
Devangshu Dutta, chief executive at retail consultant Third Eyesight, said Tata offers a good platform for Starbucks. The Indian group has deep experience in running food supplies, so it can handle the that part of the outlets. But in terms of running cafes, Tata has no specific advantage.
He said Starbucks need to address pricing issues for India, since demand is highly elastic. It is a challenge the US company has faced in its home market, with other chains competing on price. Though there are several competitors in the segment — Barista (200 outlets), Cafe Coffee Day (1,040 outlets) and Costa Coffee and others (100) – analysts said the market is far from saturated.
Harish Bijoor, chief executive officer, Harish Bijoor Consults,
says the agreement provides a win-win situation for both partners.
Tata can leverage the Starbucks name, and vice versa. The entry
of more players means the market will grow. India can absorb up
to an estimated 5,400 outlets; at the moment, the number is over
1,300.
admin
January 11, 2011
Retail Asia, January 2011
Singapore’s retailers more customer-centric and tech-savvy after recession
While caution stalled the retail industry at the beginning of last year, the first 10 months of the year saw the sector inch its way out of the downturn, according to figures released by the Singapore Department of Statistics, with the latest data revealed for last October reflecting a positive 5.3% growth in retail sales from 2009, excluding motor vehicles.
The opening of the new malls along Orchard Road and the integrated resorts (IRs) at Marina Bay and Sentosa saw tourism pick up by 16.1% over 2009, to reach 963,000 in November last year. Meanwhile, the Singapore Tourism Board anticipates that tourist arrivals will hit the 12-million mark for the full year 2010. More good news came early this month when the Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry disclosed that the local economy reversed its 1.3% contraction in 2009, climbing to a record 14.7% last year, breaking the city-state’s 40-year record of 13.8% in 1970.
“The resultant impact of this upswing is evident in the numerous retail developments that have come onboard,” observes Lester Quah, general manager of Retail Development at Cold Storage Singapore (1983) Pte Ltd, a division of Hong Kong-based retail group, Dairy Farm International.
These have attracted a number of big brands into the local retail market, heralding the return of consumer confidence and spending propensity, Quah continues, adding that in the food retail scene, players are beginning to increase their affluent offerings and differentiate themselves from the competition, which is expected to intensify.
Despite the positive buzz in the economy, challenges continue to lend a cautious optimism to the industry. Retail rents among the popular malls in Singapore continue to climb, notes Quah, despite the increase in retail space islandwide. “Retailers are competing for space and landlords command an upper hand in the selection of preferred tenants,” he says, adding that this, combined with the dwindling supply of big floor plates for supermarkets and hypermarkets, will continue to drive up rentals for these formats.
R Dhinakaran, managing director at Jay Gee Melwani Group, also points out that despite the latest mall openings and the increase in retail space, “it is infinitesimally small compared to the new businesses and brands that arekeen to set foot in Singapore”. This, he states, is another reason retail rents are “creeping north”.
Additionally, the quantity of space does not equate to quality, Courts Singapore’s CEO, Terry O’Connor, observes, adding that there remains a shortage of quality malls in the suburbs. He also laments that space constraints and shortages limit the choices that consumers have, despite the growing number of brands available in the market.
“At the mass-market level, there is still not enough choice for consumers, especially in the area of Big Box retailing,” he elaborates, adding that more Big Box, boutique, bohemian and outlet retailing need to be introduced into the local scene, which is currently “a bit too city-centric and cookie cutter”.
Retailers in Malaysia anticipate a healthy year of growth
Barring any unforeseen circumstances, the Association for Shopping Complex and High-rise Management, familiarly known as PPK (short for Persatuan Pengurusan Kompleks Malaysia), is cautiously optimistic that this year will remain positive and achieve healthy growth where retailing is concerned. “The return of consumer confidence since Q4 2009 has so far been sustainable throughout 2010 and is expected to remain so for 2011,” says its president, H C Chan.
“According to the Malaysia Retailer Association, expected sales for 2011 will be RM75 billion (US$24.3 billion). We foresee this is achievable.”
Although there was initial negative reaction when the service tax was raised from 5% to 6% in the Malaysian Budget 2011, the increase is minimal and Chan believes it should not have a major effect on consumer spending. Another significant factor in play has been an increase in tourist arrivals, which has contributed to the shopping receipts.
Even with the underlying worries that the Malaysian economy may be less competitive in view of the developments in Europe and the US, it seems to be holding well so far. The effects have been minimum. The Malaysian retail industry is still largely local consumption driven — 80% of its buyers are from the domestic market.
Says Chan: “Consumer sentiment has definitely improved with more spending taking place. However, consumers are a discerning lot these days [and] retailers have to work extra hard to deliver value propositions that appeal to them.
“In general, consumers look forvalue when they shop, and the large lowpriced fashion format as spearheaded by Uniqlo and Brands Outlet … will continue to do well.
“Patterns remain largely unchanged as consumer spending peaks during festive seasons in the second half. We don’t expect to see large deviation in this area.”
As for which sectors of the retail trade are doing better than others, Chan points out that growth rates will differ from each sub-sector with speciality retail stores showing potential double-digit growth while department store cum supermarkets are likely to see single-digit growth.
(Article continues below…)
(Article continued from above…)
Philippine retailers optimistic about the New Year
A rebound in economic growth, a growing urban population, strengthening purchasing power, continued inflow in remittances from overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) and renewed interest of foreign investors — these are just some of the factors that contribute to the general sense of heightened optimism in the growth prospects of the retail industry in the Philippines, where consumers and businesses have both indicated greater confidence in their financial prospects for this year.
According to the 65-page Philippines Retail Report released last November by consulting firm Business Monitor International, retail sales in the Philippines are expected to hit US$31.42 billion this year and should further grow to $37.06 billion by 2014.
“Strong underlying economic growth, an expanding population (especially in urban areas), rising consumer spending and the continued development of organised retail infrastructure are key factors behind the forecast growth in the Philippines’ retail sales,” the report states.
“The Philippines’ nominal GDP is a forecast US$193 billion in 2011. Average annual GDP growth of 4.5% is predicted through to 2014, reaching US$275.65 billion. With the population expected to increase from an estimated 95.5 million in 2011 to 100.9 million by 2014, GDP per capita is forecast to rise by more than 35% by the end of the forecast period, reaching US$2,732. Our forecast for consumer spending per capita is an increase from US$1,439 in 2011 to US$1,931 by 2014.”
Remittances from family members overseas are providing a big jolt to consumption, the report adds, and money coming in from OFWs is expected to grow by an average of 6%-8% this year. Already, in the first seven months of last year, remittances grew 7.1% y-o-y to US$10.68 billion.
“With the majority of remittances going into consumption rather than investments, the retail industry is one of the beneficiaries. In urban areas, in particular, there are also increasing numbers of dual-income, middleclass families and young professionals who are boosting retail sales,” the report reveals.
The bullish outlook is shared by most retail players, with the Philippine Retailers Association (PRA) estimating a 10%- 15% growth in the industry last year and at least another 10% growth this year.
“I foresee continued growth in the retail sector in the vicinity of 10% for 2011. This is largely due to sustained remittances from OFWs plus the massive growth of the business process outsourcing (BPO) industry. Barring any major geopolitical incidents, our retail sector should mirror the growth in the GDP,” says PRA president Bernie H Liu, who owns and operates such popular apparel brands as Penshoppe, Oxygen and Regatta.
Prospects brighten for Thailand’s mall and retail players
2010 is certainly a year that Thai retailers want to forget. It had started out as a potentially good year as the world economy was then slowly recovering, while on the home front a more stable government was in place after three years of political turmoil.
All signs at the time indicated that Thailand’s retail sector would bounce back strongly. But instead, it turned out to be a year of tragedy for the Bt1.4- trillion (US$45.3-billion) retail market in the kingdom that was looking towards a positive growth of 5% last year.
A prolonged demonstration by anti-government protesters in April and May that culminated in soldiers taking them on in street battles a month later stunned the world. Thousands of protesters, who had camped for weeks in the capital’s business and tourist district retreated but not before setting fire to the country’s biggest shopping mall — the CentralWorld — as well as the nearby Big C and a few other malls. It resulted in massive losses to the owners and hundreds of outlet operators, and eventually, damaging the image of the country’s retail and tourism sectors.
But still, the retail sector did recover towards the end of last year, largely due to various incentives given by the government, as well as the tourist dollars flowing in during the high season beginning October.
This signals a positive year in 2011 as retailers churn out new strategies to get the industry back on track, backed by better purchasing power on the card.
While 2009 and 2010 saw workers losing jobs or facing reduced income, an opposite trend is expected this year.
Last month, the Central Wage Committee approved increases in minimum wage levels by an average of Bt11, rising about 5.3%. This, along with the 5% salary adjustment for civil servants, are likely to improve the quality of life for workers as they have better purchasing power.
Furthermore, the retail sector, which was also impacted by the drop in tourist numbers in the first half of last year, can look forward to a fruitful 2011. The Thai tourism authorities are projecting 15.5 million tourist arrivals this year, with an expected Bt600 billion in revenue.
Urbanisation of India’s consumers spurs growth in retailing
There are three major reasons for the growth in India’s organised retail sector: Urbanisation of consumers; the increase in the disposable income of consumers; and the interest of global retail giants in the country’s retail market.
The cost involved, increased competition among organised retail chains and evolving consumer preferences are just three of the challenges faced by retail outlets. Brand distinction, consumer identification and promotions are among the other major challenges facing those who wish for their companies to prosper from the surge of Indian retail activity.
Tie-ups with international retailers and brands, emphasis on profitable growth and increased focus on private labels are set to be the three big trends in the Indian retail sector this year.
“A lot of international retailers and brands are most likely to look at India as global markets have stabilised and the Indian economy has proved to be better than most other countries. These factors give [them] a lot of confidence to invest in India,” says Arvind Singhal, chairman of Technopak Advisors, an India-based business consultancy.
Wal-Mart has set up its first unit in the country and Tesco, the UK’s largest retailer, is providing back-end support to Tata’s hypermarket, Star Bazaar. Carrefour is said to be talking to Kishore Biyani’s Future Group about a possible tie-up.
Industry sources said a number of international brands are also holding talks with Future Group, Reliance Retail and Spencer’s Retail for tie-ups.
Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of business consultancy Third Eyesight, believes franchise and licensing agreements could be a major avenue used by overseas brands to enter the country. “Our research shows that 45% of fashion and lifestyle brands, which have entered India recently, have used this route because it gives a quick entry and allows tie-ups with partners who have good real estate capabilities.”
Although retailers such as Reliance Retail, Aditya Birla Retail and Spencer’s Retail closed hundreds of stores or shifted stores to economical locations in 2009 and 2010 and took various steps to cut costs, they are likely to continue to focus on profits and boosting margins this year.
(This extract is from the article that originally appeared in Retail Asia (January 2011) – the extract is also available on Retail Asia’s website here.)
admin
December 28, 2010
MUMBAI, 28 December 2010, MINT (A partner to the Wall Street Journal)
Sapna Agarwal
The Bindra family, the owners of Biba Apparels Pvt. Ltd, which owns a popular women’s ethnic wear brand of the same name, is on the verge of splitting, said a person directly involved in the development, who did not want to be identified till the details are made public.
Sanjay Bindra, 45, will sell his stake for around Rs 75 crore in an all-cash deal, added this person.
Siddharth Bindra, 36, confirmed that Sanjay Bindra was exiting the business and added that he would be buying his brother out. He declined to speak about the specifics till the transaction is complete.
The Kishore Biyani-promoted Future Ventures India Ltd owns an 18% stake in Biba that it acquired in 2006 for an undisclosed amount. The Bindras own the rest of the privately-held firm. The individual stakes of Sanjay and Siddharth aren’t known; privately-held firms do not have to disclose their shareholding pattern.
Biba, founded 22 years ago by the brothers’ mother Meena Bindra, ended the year to March with revenue of Rs 180 crore and, according to the person cited in the first instance, will end the year to March with revenue of around Rs 200 crore.
Meena Bindra started the business in 1988 with a bank loan of Rs 8,000, selling ethnic wear from home. Sanjay joined the family business in 1994 and Siddharath, in 2002; soon after the firm started film merchandising, creating special clothing lines for Bollywood films.
Biba’s clothing is available in 100 retail outlets across 25 cities, according to its website.
Sanjay Bindra is still on the board of Biba Apparels but he has already started work on his new company, which is likely to sell ethnic-wear apparel under the brand “7 East”, the person cited in the first instance said.
“The company will be launched by mid-March with 18 stores and 60 shop-in-shop stores. The 7 East brand will look at tie-ups with designers such as Manish Malhotra, known to style Bollywood celebrities, and other international designers,” he added.
In 2009, the market for domestic apparel was worth Rs 1.54 trillion and is expected to reach Rs 4.7 trillion by 2020, according to India Textile and Apparel Compendium 2010 published by Technopak Advisors, a retail consulting firm.
It is a highly fragmented market with few significant brands such as Biba, Ritu Kumar and private labels from retailers such as Trent Ltd’s Westside and Future Group’s Pantaloons.
The organized apparel market is expected to grow from 14% at the end of 2009 to 40% by end of 2020, said the report.
Unlike the Western market, customer preferences for Indian ethnic wear vary across the length and breadth of the country, making it difficult for brands to establish themselves nationally, said Devangshu Dutta, founder of retail consulting firm Third Eyesight, explaining why very few brands have succeeded.
admin
December 16, 2010
Business
Standard, Mumbai,16 Dec 2010
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The apparel & textile major now wants separate strategies for each of its brands.
Last month, S Kumars Nationwide (SKNL) invited pitches from advertisement agencies for its brands. The purpose: repositioning of the brands that include Reid & Taylor and Belmonte. The company has already finalised two out of five pitches from the shortlisted agencies and wants to complete the entire process by January.
But the move surprised many as the brands are already in clear price segments with little overlap. But Ashesh Amin, director of the textile and apparel major, thinks a lot more can be done. “SKNL’s apparel brands have grown big and we operate in different segments. There are some overlaps between fabrics and apparels in case of some labels,” Amin says. For instance, Reid & Taylor and Belmonte sell both ready to wear (RTW) and fabrics.
SKNL is in almost all segments of textiles: fabric, RTW and home textiles. It retails half-a-dozen brands in the RTW segment and a handful in fabrics, which are across price segments.
Within RTW, the company sells Stephen Brothers in super premium, Reid & Taylor in premium, Belmonte in mid-price segment and World Player in economy and retails Reid & Taylor, Baruche, Belmonte and SKumars in fabrics.
So what does Amin propose to do to break the clutter? Apart from setting up an integrated supply chain and focusing on designs and merchandising, Amin wants to launch individual strategies for each of his brands.
The strategy will decide which cities to target, what type of communication to adopt for each brand, which type of events to be associated with etc.
SKNL has already carved out 10 strategic business units such as home textiles, luxury suitings and so on and half-a-dozen chief operating officers (COOs) to manage the RTW brands.
Retail consultants agree with SKNL’s strategy. “Any company with multiple brands has to be very clear about how they segment their brands. Otherwise their own brands end up cannibalising each other,” says Devangshu Dutta, chief executive, Third Eyesight, a business consultancy.
For instance, he says Madura Garments has clearly segmented its brands such as Louis Philippe, Allen Solly, Van Heusen from the beginning and Arvind had a clarity in terms of denim products such as Lee, Flying Machine which are addressing different segments.
But Susil Dungarwal, founder of Beyond Squarefeet, a mall management firm, says SKNL is yet to find its niche in retailing. “A lot of people have left them and as exits happen, the perception of growth plans also change,” he says.
The new branding strategy is also important for SKNL as it is looking to diversify its portfolio and launch new brands at different price points.
For instance, the recently launched economy brand ‘World Player’ is a new focus area, says Amin. The mass brand, in the prices range of Rs 129-Rs 499, could become a Rs 100 crore brand in 12 months and “Rs 1,000 crore in four to five years”, he adds.
Out of 622 districts in the country, the company wants to be in 520 districts in the next 18 months. It has already covered 130 since the launch, he says.
Currently, Bollywood superstars Amitabh Bachchan and Shahrukh Khan are the brand ambassadors of the company’s Reid & Taylor and Belmonte brands.
“We will continue to have a strong brand ambassador-led strategy, but that is not the only thing in our brand campaigns,” says Amin.
SKNL is also gearing up for the launch of its premium casual brand KRUGER which is designed in Italy. The launch is expected in March. Initially, the company is looking at 10 outlets. The company is targeting a business of Rs 100 crore from KRUGER in the first three years, he says.
With a price band of Rs 999 to Rs 4999, it will compete with brands such as Tommy Hilfiger and ColorPlus, consultants say.
“While these brands operate independently at the front end, they will strategically integrate at the back-end,” he adds.
Amin says the new strategy is backed by the economics of the business. He says brands are growing 200 per cent in terms of revenues compared to last year. The company wants to increase the share of RTW to total sales to 25 per cent in FY 2011 and 40 per cent in the next two years, from 11 per cent in FY 2010.
The company is also planning to take Reid & Taylor to the US in the next six to eight months and develop designs suited for that market as part of an overall expansion programme. SKNL posted net profit of Rs 77.89 crore and sales of Rs 1,211.42 crore in the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
admin
December 15, 2010
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The MRP, or the maximum retail price, of a product plays an important role in the customer’s purchase decision. It tells them the maximum amount they need to spend to buy a product.
The rationale behind printing the MRP on products is to protect the consumer from being overcharged by retailers. No doubt, the MRP does its job well in informing consumers about the ‘fair price’ of a product, but it fails to give retailers the much-needed flexibility in determining the price based on various factors – services offered, location of the store, among many others – that determine the actual cost of a product for a retailer. So, is the concept of MRP still relevant? And, will withdrawing the MRP be beneficial for the stakeholders, mainly retailers and consumers?
In a poll question asked by IndiaRetailing – ‘Should MRP be withdrawn from product categories to allow headroom pricing?’ – 83.29 per cent of the respondents said “No”, while only 16.36 per cent said “Yes”. The remaining 0.35 per cent, however, opted for “Can’t Say”.
But what do experts thinks about the MRP?
“The rationale behind the MRP being mentioned on the packaging [of a product] is to avoid consumers being fleeced by ‘unscrupulous’ retailers. I don’t see that rationale disappearing until there is much greater price transparency in the market, or more consolidation and structure,” says Devangshu Dutta, chief executive, Third Eyesight.
On whether the MRP affects the flexibility of a retailer to sell products at a price lower than the maximum retail price, Dutta’s answer is a firm “No”. He reasons: “This doesn’t affect the flexibility of retailers to sell at prices lower than the MRP. If a retailer wants to work with dynamic pricing, for specific promotions, or to promote sales on a particular day or time, it has the freedom to do so by selling below the MRP. Obviously this flexibility will be more in private label merchandise, or with categories where there is enough margin play.”
Zahir Laliwala, CEO, SportXS, also supports the MRP and says, “It brings transparency in the system. The MRP needs to stay for the consumer’s benefit.”
Siddharthan Sundaram, director – retailer services, The Nielsen Company, however, does not agree with Dutta or Laliwala. He says, “If the government withdraws the MRP, it will create competition among suppliers and manufacturers and this will ultimately help consumers to buy goods at a competitive price.”
Supporting the withdrawal of the MRP, Sundaram says, “I strongly believe it will help all stakeholders, particularly consumers.”
T S Ashwin, MD, Odyssey India Ltd, is of the opinion that the MRP makes it difficult for retailers to manage margins, “as they can’t charge anything beyond the maximum retail price printed on the product”.
Explaining his stand, he says, “When we take up outlets in airports or five-star hotels, the cost of operation is much higher and internationally it is an accepted practice to charge more in such outlets. But in India, we cannot do so due to the MRP. This again impacts our margins.”
Giving the example of Odyssey, he says, “We are a category where over 80 per cent of products are with an MRP. Though there is VAT, the rates are different in each state for the same product. This makes it very difficult to manage margins, as we cannot charge anything beyond the MRP. Not always can we get the vendors to bear the additional cost due to differential tax rates. Also transferring stocks from one state to another becomes a problem due to the same issue. We lose on margins as well as the vendors don’t reimburse.”
He further says, “With VAT coming in, the concept of MRP should be done away with and retailers be allowed to fix their prices based on the market demand, etc [and other factors].”
Clearly, there are strong arguments both in favour of and against the MRP. While some believe the MRP is necessary to protect the consumer, others strongly feel that ‘flexi-pricing’, where the power to decide the price of a product lies with the retailer, will help retailers offer a better deal to customers. Now, the big question is: can we try giving retailers a chance to fix the prices?