admin
April 22, 2013
Vandana, The Week
Mumbai, April 22, 2013

It
has been six months since the Indian government allowed 51 per
cent FDI (foreign direct investment) in multi-brand retail. However,
in spite of numerous attempts at wooing foreign retailers, there
has hardly been any investment. Global retailers who had lobbied
for access to India’s multi-brand market have, so far, shied away
from entering. “It is not enough to criticise the government,”
said Finance Minister P. Chidambaram. “India Inc. should
go back and loosen their purse strings.”
Commerce Minister Anand Sharma and his team at the department
of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) have been meeting foreign
retailers, consultants and industry representatives. They networked
with the who’s who of global trade at the World Economic Forum
in Davos in January, but FDI in multi-brand retail in India remains
elusive.
“India is not an easy market to do business,” said
Devangshu Dutta, CEO of Third Eyesight, a specialist management
consulting firm focusing on consumer products and retail. “Retailers
will have to put infrastructure in place along with a host of
government clearances. A calibrated opening would have been better.
China took 11 to 12 years to open up its retail sector. They [the
government] should have consulted people across the spectrum,
rather than hasten the process. They have overstated economic
benefits and understated adverse effects.”
None of the global retail giants—Sainsbury’s, Walmart, Carrefour
and Tesco—has expressed a desire to enter the Indian multi-brand
retail sector. “We have not received any proposal for relaxation
of norms,” said Saurabh Chandra, secretary, DIPP.
Sainsbury’s and Tesco have opened sourcing offices in India but
are still noncommittal on multi-brand entry. “We have no
plans to open stores in India as we are continuing to focus on
growing our business in the UK,” said Tom Parker, spokesperson
for Sainsbury’s.
A reason for the reluctance of prospective investors is the continuing
protests by local traders and politicians. “The presence
of global retailers will lead to loss of jobs and local shops
will not survive,” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general
of Confederation of All India Traders. “They will bring predatory
pricing and end competition. Even in the case of cash-and-carry,
they have been flouting norms. We will continue our opposition.”
India’s first wholesale joint venture Bharti Walmart’s cash-and-carry
store in Agra has 48,000 registered members. The store is abuzz
with activity as local shopkeepers and traders pour in to stock
up their shops. They make impressive margins. “I save Rs.8
to Rs.100 on various products,” said a shop owner. Seeing
its popularity, Carrefour has opened a store in another part of
Agra.
The cash-and-carry business serves as a learning ground for global
retailers, who first want to get comfortable with wholesale operations,
infrastructure and supply chains before venturing into multi-brand
retail. However, there are other reasons, too.
The FDI policy states that each state can decide if it wants
to allow foreign retailers into its territory. With Gujarat, Kerala,
Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar expressing
their reservations, retailers are left with few options.
“Allowing foreign investment in the retail sector is clearly
in violation of Gandhian principles and ideology,” said Odisha
Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik. “FDI in retail will also lead
to loss of income for small traders across the country.”
Even in states that have welcomed FDI, the opposition’s stand
on the subject is key as retailers are at risk of losing their
investment if the government changes.
“While a lot of background work is being done by global
retailers looking to enter the Indian market, the uncertain political
environment makes them jittery,” says Darshana Shah, business
head of marketing and visual merchandising, HyperCity Retail.
“With elections round the corner, people are still waiting
and watching. Many foreign retailers are visiting stores, doing
surveys and due diligence, but it will take time.”
The policy states that foreign retailers can open their outlets
only in cities with a population of more than 10 lakh. Going by
the 2011 census, there are 45 cities that make the cut. Of these,
only 19 can attract FDI as the remaining 26 are in states that
oppose it.
The sourcing clause is also a contentious issue. Under the policy,
multi-brand retailers should source 30 per cent of manufactured
or processed products from Indian ‘small industries’ with investment
in plant and machinery not exceeding $1 million. “Apart from
worries over quality, the mandatory sourcing norm will restrict
retailers in getting products with technical specialisations,”
says Pinakiranjan Mishra, partner and head of retail and consumer
products at Ernst & Young, India. “Retail players will
have to incur high costs towards training a large number of small
suppliers, with the brand reputation at stake. Foreign retailers
can’t keep monitoring whether the small industry has exceeded
$1 million.”
The policy also requires foreign retailers to invest 50 per cent
in ‘back-end infrastructure’ within three years. The government’s
argument for the clause is that it wants to strengthen supply
chain infrastructure. Globally, however, the supply chain is either
outsourced or shared between various players.
“Everyone investing in their own supply chain is a highly
inefficient model,” said Arvind Singhal, managing director
of retail consultancy Technopak. “There are concepts of third-party
and fourth-party logistics wherein the third party builds the
cold chains and warehouses that are used by several players.”
The major chunk of back-end cost will comprise land cost and rent
of warehouses, but many foreign retailers already have back-end
facilities for their existing wholesale ventures.
The slowdown of the world economy has made foreign retailers all the more cautious. Most are from countries currently under severe financial strain. So, they would rather put their house in order before venturing out.
Deterrents to foreign multi-brand retailers
* Mandatory 30 per cent sourcing from Indian small industries
* Political uncertainty
* Mandatory large investment in back-end infrastructure
* Violent protests from trade unions and shop owners
* Global slowdown and reputation issues. Walmart’s Indian unit
under the government scanner
admin
April 20, 2013
Caroline Perry, Drapers
London, April 20, 2013
With
a youthful population, and growing affluent middle class that
is projected to grow tenfold by 2025, retailers have long eyed
up this vast country as one ripe for expansion, but it has remained
a complex proposition with many challenges.
"There is still a lot of low-hanging fruit in India,"
says Ira Kalish, head of consumer business at consultancy Deloitte.
"But the retail market is still dominated by family-owned
stores. Only about 15% of the market is modern retailing."
This slow growth has been due to India previously being closed
to foreign direct investment. Until the beginning of 2012, retailers
interested in opening in India had to do so with a partner, as
regulations only allowed them to own 51% of their Indian business.
While such regulations remain in place for multi-brand retailers,
single-brand retailers can now own 100% of their operation, although
there is a stipulation that the Indian arm of the business sources
30% of its stock from small to medium-sized Indian suppliers.
Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of management retail consultancy
Third Eyesight, says India accounts for about 10% of total sourcing
for most international fashion brands: "We shouldn’t expect
any dramatic changes, though we do expect the growth in joint
ventures and subsidiaries to continue in the coming months and
years."
Having a local partnership can also be key to navigating India’s
complex foreign trade and legal regulations, says Jonathan Coates,
relationship director for fashion, retail and wholesale at Natwest/RBS
banks. "Local expertise is key if you’re looking to export
to India but you must research potential partners properly first."
According to Dutta, there are about 10 groups that work as
franchisees, licensees and joint-venture partners to a substantial
number of international brands in the market, including franchise
operator Future Group, retail giant Reliance, textile business
Arvind and smaller entrepreneurial companies such as Genesis Luxury.
Footwear retailer Clarks formed a joint venture with Future,
India’s largest retailer, for its launch into the market in 2011.
Although that predates the regulation change, Andrew Martland,
Clarks’ president for Asia Pacific, says it has no plans to change
strategy: "We wanted a partner that understood the dynamics
of the market, such as where to actually locate the stores. There
was so much mall development at the time – we wanted to make sure
we picked the right malls. Plus a local partner has bargaining
power with the landlords."
Clarks has 26 stores across nine major cities, including Delhi,
Mumbai and Bangalore. The majority are located in shopping malls,
although it does have some high street locations. Its first store
opened on a big shopping destination street in Delhi, which Martland
said was a statement location for Clarks when it opened.
Clarks’ experience mirrors the kind of property availability
there is in India, with malls and shopping centres increasingly
popular. During the boom years, from 2004-08, retailers had to
speculatively rent space to ensure they would get into the right
locations, but real-estate costs have risen and more conservative
growth in recent years means retailers have become more selective.
Meanwhile, Dutta adds: "I would say the ability to evaluate
site feasibility is a bigger issue than availability of sites."
Clarks’ partnership with Future also gave it access to its logistics
business, FutureLogistics, which handles its physical stores.
This allowed Clarks to avoid dealing with India’s fragmented logistics
market. Although, the footwear retailer recently appointed a specialist
ecommerce logistic partner to service its website, which launched
at the end of last year.
Dutta says it is common for retailers and brands to use a
combination of logistics operators. "A majority of retailers
blend services of large and small third-party logistics operators,
especially if their store network is dispersed across the country."
There are mixed reports on the reliability of India’s infrastructure,
with the majority suggesting it is comparatively poor, although
Martland contests it is developing quickly with a motorway network
"of sorts" and improved airlines.
Anita Balchandani, partner at OC&C Strategy Consultants, believes the non-food infrastructure is at an early stage, which means there are difficulties in the last-mile service for retailers considering online as a way of testing the market. India has a nascent ecommerce business, which is expected to be driven by mobiles rather than desktop PCs.
Import duties are quite high, particularly for footwear because
it has a big domestic manufacturing market and is seeking to protect
it. "Customs and import is complicated," says Martland,
who adds that it is a difficult regulatory market, even for getting
shops and establishment licences for each store. There is also
a complex tax structure and, for many retailers, the level of
bureaucracy can be overwhelming.
To succeed in India, there are certain things specific to Indian
consumers such as the demand for a range of styles driven by the
regional differences in weather, says Martland. "There are
lots of brands that have come to India – some that are successful
and some that aren’t," he explains. "It is those willing
to adapt that survive."
admin
April 16, 2013
Suneera Tandon, MINT (A Wall Street Journal Partner)
April 16, 2013

Radio
jockey Alisha Anand, 26, is ready to spend Rs.26,000 on a pair
sunglasses from American luxury label Tom Ford this summer. The
Delhi-based Anand, who works for 94.3 FM, budgets for a pair of
new shades every summer, although she agrees that this year, “it’s
a bit expensive”.
Women like Anand are driving up sales for companies such as Luxottica
India Eyewear Pvt. Ltd. The local subsidiary of the Luxottica
Group, which sells brands such as Ray-Ban and Oakley, has seen
the number of women consumers double in the last four years, spurring
demand for branded sunglasses.
“It’s largely an urban-centric consumption, driven
by lifestyle changes, exposure to media and higher disposable
incomes. Women are gaining more economic independence and can
afford multiple ownership of products such as sunglasses,”
said Amitabh Sehdev, head of marketing at Luxottica India, which
also retails sunglasses branded Prada, Burberry and Vogue through
600 outlets across 90 cities.
Currently 40-45% of the collection in terms of volume is devoted
to women’s products by Luxottica. The category is growing
at 30% compared with 20% for men’s sunglasses, the company
said.
According to a March 2012 report on the sector by the Associated
Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham), the sunglasses
market was estimated at Rs.2,200 crore in 2012. The report suggested
that premium sunglasses—brands such as Esprit, Giorgio Armani,
Cartier, Tommy Hilfiger, Ray-Ban, Dolce and Gabbana, Calvin Klein
and Police—are growing at 40% a year and that high-end eyewear
accounts for about 30% of the market.
Maui Jim, the American eyewear brand that has been present in
India since 2009, has increased the proportion of women’s
sunglasses to 30% from 5%.
“We are seeing a big demand from women consumers coming
from cities such as Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore,” said I. Rahumathullah,
managing director, Maui Jim India. Higher disposable incomes and
the need to match occasion and ensemble are among the reasons
for this, he said.
While women are adding to the growing consumer base, the availability
of multiple brands and a marked shift towards them are driving
growth in the category, according to experts.
The availability and visibility of such products in retail
areas such as malls is helping boost demand for sungalsses, said
Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of New Delhi-based management
consulting firm Third Eyesight. The difference in the growth rates
is also because men generally go with one look that combines style
and practicality, while women have a keener eye for style.
“Men would buy shades for protection and quality while
women would go for multiple brands to suit different occasions,”
Dutta said.
The availability of branded products has helped push sales, said
Ravi Kant, chief executive officer, eyewear business at Titan
Industries Ltd, which operates 220 Titan Eye+ stores in 72 cities
that sell brands such as Vogue, Cabana, Esprit, Fastrack and Ray-Ban,
among others.
“Earlier, the optical outlet was the brand, but today consumers
differentiate one brand from another,” he said, adding that
people who come into the stores now ask for brands by name.
Preferences differ by region, according to the trade. In the
north, women like glasses with logos prominently emblazoned on
them. Consequently, luxury labels such as Armani and Dolce and
Gabbana are popular there.
Kolkata-based retailer GKB Opticals has seen demand for brands
at its 60 stories across the country, with customers seeking out
sunglasses carrying names such as Jimmy Choo, Vogue, Ray-Ban and
Prada.
Over the past two years, women sunglasses buyers have doubled
at GKB, according to Dibyendu Roy, national sales manager, who
feels that the presence of dedicated multi-brand retail outlets
have improved the sales scope of the item.
The growing number of women consumers is good news for companies
as they tend to spend more than men, according to Amit Chaudhary,
co-founder and chief operating officer at Lenskart.com, the online
retailer that said it gets up to 2,000 orders per day for products
such as frames and sunglasses.
He said the average price of sunglasses bought by women is higher
than that purchased by men. “They spend more time reviewing
the product and are more focused on quality. Men are impulsive
buyers,” he said.
The site sells brands such as Prada, Burberry, Ray-Ban, Maui
Jim and Vogue. The proportion of women online shoppers has risen
to 35% from 25% about two years back.
“Consumers are spending more on the category overall,” said Roy of GKB, which also witnessed a rise in average price tags of sunglasses sold, especially to women.
admin
April 10, 2013
Raghavendra
Kamath, Business Standard
![]()
![]()
![]()


Each of the eight brands of the British retailer are clearly segmented and displayed using props and visual merchandising. For instance, its brand ‘Limited Collection’ has been given a fashion-focused feel with an illuminated catwalk, while women’s casual-wear brand ‘Indigo Collection’ has been displayed with trestle tables and denim mannequins. Another women’s wear brand ‘per una’ is presented with white-washed wooden wardrobes and chandeliers.
"The new format is a part of our global strategy of upgraded stores. Sub-brands have been relaunched with clearer differentiation so that navigation becomes easier," says Venu Nair, managing director, Marks & Spencer Reliance India.
In fact, the £600 million-revamp, involving 800 stores, started in its home market UK in September 2011 after a study that reflected the difficulty faced by customers in moving around in the stores.
M&S, which has a 51:49 joint venture with Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Retail, has opened half-a-dozen new format stores like the one in Bangalore with an average size of 20,000 sq ft to 23,000 sq ft. The chain wants to open five more in the next couple of months. Currently, it has 29 stores.
Consultants say the government allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi brand retail has partly played a role in M&S focusing on sub-brands.
"Earlier, under the single brand regime, the rule was that besides having your brand name on the store, every product should have the brand name of the company. With FDI allowed, it would be easier for foreign retailers to launch sub-brands here," says Devangshu Dutta, chief executive, Third Eyesight, a retail consultant.
However, M&S’s Nair says it wants customers to have the same store experience as they would have seen in its stores in international destinations.
But, will this strategy work?
Dutta says sub-brands help target more specific segments (by age, gender, usage occasion etc.), if they are handled well. "This can help fine tune not just product needs, but also create specific or limited promotions without it being carried over to other parts of the store or other sub-brands," he adds.
Even home grown fashion retailers such as Shoppers Stop, Future Group are focusing on their sub-brands to drive sales. For instance, Shoppers Stop has run specific activations around its apparel brand Haute Curry and extended that to jewellery and footwear. But that can’t be strictly compared with M&S, as unlike them, M&S only sells brands that are owned by it.
Such revamps are crucial for established brands such as M&S given that the Indian fashion scene is changing fast with the entry of fast fashion brands such as Zara and Mango, and the expected foray of fashion brands such as H&M, Uniqlo and others.
For M&S, the revamp is the second such major experiment in its 12-odd year presence in India. In 2007, it cut prices of its merchandise by 35 per cent to reposition itself as a mid-market retailer. It also introduced more lines as customers perceived its prices to be too high and designs limited and not suitable for Indian context
While its rivals say M&S was stuck between premium department stores such as Shoppers Stop and mass market retailer such as Big Bazaar, executives at M&S Reliance say that the strategy was well thought out. "If you are a premium retailer, and have prices more than Rs 3,000 apiece, the volumes are going to be low. We thought it is better to be a mid-market player here," an executive adds.
M&S has also increased sourcing from India and south Asia significantly. It sources around 61 per cent of its merchandise from the region which helped it to offer lower prices here.
Marks & Spencer Reliance made losses of Rs 18.66 crore and Rs 9.13 crore in FY 2010, FY 2011 respectively, and the company is still making losses. But same-store sales growth is good at all stores. Nair says many of the chain’s categories are doing very well. For instance, men’swear sales jumped 31 per cent during the December quarter and lingerie went up 28 per cent.
While the chain is reportedly set to bring its food section here, its peers and ad consultants say this could be challenging given that food is normally associated with hypermarkets.
(With inputs from Sounak Mitra)
admin
April 2, 2013
Nilofer D’Souza, Forbes India
April 2, 2013


The Euro 43 billion French group’s venture is one of the
early bird licences under a new investment policy which allows
100 per cent foreign funding of single-brand retail stores. Though
the government had cleared the policy in November, some niggling
issues regarding local sourcing had remained and it was finally
notified in January. Auchan’s proposal to invest Rs 700 crore
went through on February 13, the same day that the FIPB also cleared
single-brand retail plans of Promod SAS, Le Creuset and Fossil.
Most of Decathlon’s stores now sport an ‘open to all’
sign to indicate the change in its policy. It states the change
on its Facebook page too. In a comment to customers, Decathlon
Mumbai, says, “FDI in retail did not allow foreign retailers
to sell to individuals directly. We were respecting the law of
the land by being a wholesaler.”
Decathlon does not have a clear competitor as the sports goods
retail market in India is populated with small over-the-counter
stores or a few hundred square feet space in department stores.
It has been present in the wholesale market with a cash-and-carry
model for the past three years. This would be the first test of
big-format retail’s impact on small merchants in a niche
segment.
Decathlon stores are big—sprawling over at least 4000 square
feet. In comparison, sports goods shops in the country are tiny.
Even in malls or supermarkets, sports goods get only a corner,
about half the area of a typical Decathalon store. It uses the
extra space for indoor sporting facilities.
“It could turn out to be a category killer, and create
and define the category because of the experience and product
mix it has,” says Devangshu Dutta, chief executive, Third
Eyesight, a retail consultancy, “Even with wholesale operation
in Bangalore, they have done fairly well. They broke even fairly
quickly,” he says.
The company opened a store in Mumbai last week and plans to open
in Hyderabad and Chandigarh too. About 3000 customers thronged
the store on the first day. That is a big draw for a niche segment
currently valued at Rs 2,500 crore but estimated to grow to $6
billion by 2025 in India.
In cities, people are starved for entertainment beyond movies, restaurants and malls. Decathlon has potential to provide weekend entertainment alternatives. That fits with its own target audience – the family.