admin
February 4, 2014
Sagar
Malviya & Rasul Bailay, The Economic Times
![]()
![]()
![]()


The world’s most popular ‘fast fashion’ brand, Zara’s Indian
unit Inditex Trent – a joint venture between the brand’s owner
Inditex with Tata Group’s retail arm Trent – has made profits
in two out of the three years it has been around. In contrast,
Levi Strauss continues to be in the red despite being in India
for over a decade.
Zara has replicated a model that has worked for it globally –
creating affordable, copycat versions of the latest fashions or
designer-wear and making them available to shoppers in double-quick
time. Inditex not only owns Zara, it also controls almost every
bit of operations – from design to distribution and a large chunk
of manufacturing. If a new style is not a hit within a week, it
goes off the shelves. Even popular styles don’t stay long. There
is no warehousing and reorders are rare.
“Zara is known for its fresh fashion delivery every week. Their weekly delivery supply chain is the best in the world. Consumers always think these clothes will go out of stock if they don’t buy them quickly,” said Vineet Gautam, country head for Bestseller Retail, a rival of Zara’s that sells brands such as Vero Moda and Jack & Jones.
In the first half of 2012, Inditex clocked revenues of US$9.3 billion (Rs. 49,000 crore).
The Indian unit made profits of Rs. 38.3 crore and Rs. 22.5 crore in the previous two financial years, documents filed with the registrar of companies show. Zara declined comment for the report.
Jaspal Singh Sabharwal, a partner with Everstone Capital, a private equity fund with investments in retail chains, said Zara in India churns out more than 10,000 designs in a season and that helps it stay relevant to customers. Moreover, customers visit Zara stores – there are nine of them – some 14 times on average in a year, resulting in 85% of merchandise being sold at full price compared with the industry average of 60%.
Zara’s early success in India reflects its global growth.
Amancio Ortega Gaona, who was last year named the third-richest man in the world, founded Zara as a maker of lingerie in the northern Spanish town of La Coruna in 1963. Today, there are 1,600 Zara stores in 85 countries.
Industry executives said demand is only part of the reason for Zara’s financial success in India. It strikes hard bargains with landlords and mall owners, keeping real estate costs in control. Most of Zara’s back-end and merchandise sourcing are handled by Inditex while the Tata expertise is mainly for identifying real estate and locations. Of the eight directors on the board of Inditex Trent, just three – Trent’s vice-chairman Noel Tata, Inditex Trent’s Chief Financial Officer P Venkatesalu, and the company’s MD Sanjay Rao – are Indians. Rao, who was financial controller at Inditex in North America, moved to India to launch the operations.
As Zara expands in India, experts said the challenge will be to sustain sales momentum. “There might not be many locations which could give them high sales per square foot. Also, as they open more stores, the initial scarcity value could erode,” said Devangshu Dutta, chief executive of retail consultancy Third Eyesight.
Inditex Trent plans to open over 18 stores in the next three years in cities such as Mangalore, Surat and Indore, said a person aware of the plans.
The pitfall could be that shoppers in these cities may not have the same attraction for Zara despite having the propensity to spend on international brands. Several mall owners are also getting wary about renting stores to Zara.
admin
February 3, 2014
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


“Price rises coupled with low consumer sentiment thus impacted demand in the marketplace resulting in higher inventories. Additional costs had to be incurred on discounting during the end-of-season sale and on consumer promotions to stimulate demand, significantly impacting profitability of the company. Similar trends were observed across all key listed apparel brands,” the company said in a filing with the Registrar of Companies.
In a competitive market, Levi Strauss wasn’t able to draw customers and was compelled to cut its losses. A director of Levi Strauss India told FE on condition of anonymity, “We have been ruthless in closing unprofitable stores and cutting down on our vendors.”
Clearly, Levi’s, which slugs it out with brands like Lee and Wrangler, hasn’t been a success is the mass segment and has scrapped its Denizen label; it has also phased out Dockers. As a result, revenues were lower by 34% in FY13 at Rs 485 crore in FY13. In the previous year, revenues had risen 24%.
But the Indian subsidiary of the iconic jeans brand isn’t giving up yet. “While we have shut 45 unprofitable stores, we have also set up 70 outlets over the past year,” the director quoted above said. That leaves the chain with some 400 exclusive stores.
The company said in an emailed reply to FE that it does not share any specific details of stores or financials in the country.
When Levi Strauss entered the Indian market in 1994-95, it was served by just a handful of vendors. “Over a period of time, the number of vendors increased since there was more product variety,” said Devangshu Dutta of retail consultancy Third Eyesight.
Bangalore-based Prateek Apparels, which started making jeans for Levi’s eight years ago, supplies roughly 40,000 units a month. “Due to a slow market we have seen some dip in demand and last year our monthly sales dropped to 10,000 units,” said the company’s general manager Shiva Prasad.
The US multinational acknowledged the weakness in the Indian market in its latest annual report. “In Asia, revenues declined due to stiff economic headwinds in the key markets of China and India, and the exit of the Denizen brand. We’ll continue to focus on key emerging markets, focusing on getting our business back on track in China and India,” the company said. About 16% of the company’s revenues comes in from the Asia-Pacific region, with China forming a large chunk of it, followed by India.
With consumer demand slipping in a sluggish economy, retailers are trying to survive by changing the product mix, right-sizing stores or closing down unviable outlets. Like other foreign brands in India, Levi’s is positioned as an aspirational brand but may have to change tack to attract value-conscious customers much the way Marks & Spencer has done.
(Sourced from Financial Express .)
admin
February 2, 2014
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


The BJP is considered to be more investor-friendly than India’s ruling Congress party but opposes foreign direct investment in supermarkets because of its impact on small shopkeepers. It unseated Congress in Rajasthan’s state elections in December.
The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India criticized Rajasthan’s policy reversal, made on Friday, saying it would "dent and shake" global investor confidence.
"If one party reverses the decision of its rival dispensation upon change of guards, the policy and political risks for global investors would definitely increase in India, scaring them away," D. S. Rawat, secretary general of ASSOCHAM, said in a statement.
In late 2012, the government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh opened India’s $500 billion retail industry to foreign operators, allowing companies such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT.N) and Tesco Plc (TSCO.L) to own majority stakes in Indian chains for the first time.
However, India left it up to individual states to decide whether or not to allow foreign retailers.
So far, fewer than half of India’s 28 states have adopted the policy, making it harder for retailers to exploit economies of scale by setting up sourcing and cold storage networks that could serve stores in contiguous states.
Stringent local sourcing rules and worries that the policy might be overturned have also kept most global supermarket chains on the sidelines.
Polls show the BJP is on track to win the most seats nationally in elections due by May. However, no party is expected to win the 272 seats needed for an outright majority, meaning the biggest party will seek to form a coalition with regional parties.
TESCO IS LONE INVESTOR
Tesco, the world’s third-largest retailer, in December unveiled a relatively modest plan to invest $110 million in Tata Group’s Trent Hypermarket Ltd (TREN.NS) to open stores in the states of Maharashtra and Karnataka.
Maharashtra is home to the Indian financial capital, Mumbai, and is led by a Congress party alliance. Neighbouring Karnataka, where the technology hub of Bangalore is located, is run by a Congress government.
"We have noted the decision of the state government and will bear it in mind as we consider our future plans," a Tesco spokesperson told Reuters.
In October, Wal-Mart, the world’s biggest retailer, walked away from its partnership with India’s Bharti Enterprises to set up retail stores, citing unfriendly regulations. Wal-Mart still runs wholesale outlets in India.
Last month, the newly-elected Aam Aadmi (Common Man) Party government in New Delhi barred foreign supermarkets in the capital.
The Indian economy grew 4.5 percent in the last fiscal year, or less than half its rate in the years before the global financial crisis, and sluggish investment due in part to inconsistent policies has contributed to the slowdown.
"From any investor’s perspective – foreign or domestic – he is looking at how predictable the environment is in the future," said Devangshu Dutta, chief executive officer of Third Eyesight, a retail consultancy.
"The policy framework and the overall environment are not encouraging the foreign investor to take that call," he said.
(Additional reporting by Aditi Shah, Nandita Bose and Prashant Mehra; Editing by Kim Coghill)
(Sourced from Reuters.)
admin
January 28, 2014
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


Oak Lawn Marketing, a subsidiary of Japanese telecom company NTT DoCoMo, is set to enter India’s burgeoning virtual retailing space through a tie-up with TVC Skyshop, which operates in the same segment.
Virtual retailing refers to companies selling products through television or print (magazines and newspapers). India’s virtual retailing market is close to ?2,000 crore and includes players such as TVC Skyshop, Indiatimes, Homeshop18, Shraddha Skyshop, Star CJ and the US-based GuthyRenker.
OLM, a $300-million media and branding company in which NTT DoCoMo
has a 51 per cent stake, is close to ink the deal with TVC Skyshop
in two weeks, after which Indian consumers can get access to “high
quality” Japanese products, said people aware of the development.
The company primarily focuses on home convenience, health and
beauty consumable, fitness and wellness products.
Sources added there will be some major equity infusion by OLM in the coming months. Interestingly, the deal is happening a time when NTT DoCoMo’s investment in India’s telecom space hangs in the balance. The company, which holds a 26 per cent stake in Tata Teleservices, is expected to take a call by March on whether to stay invested or exit Indian venture, according to some reports.
TVC Skyshop Managing Director Vinod Agarwal did not respond to an email sent by Business Line.
TVC Skyshop, which has investments from private equity players such as Samara Capital and Morpheus, currently sells apparels, electronic items and other consumer durables under its own label. After the tie-up, it will sell OLM’s two flagship products – Magic Mattress and Leg Magic.
For the Nagoya-based company, the tie-up will benefit from
understanding the market and the consumer mindset. Besides, there
are regulatory hurdles in terms of foreign direct investment,
said Devangshu Dutta of marketing and consultancy firm Third Eyesight.
“Payment through cards remains a major challenge for the online or virtual retailing industry. Companies like OLM do not have expertise in managing cash on delivery and reverse logistics. Hence, the tie-up will help the company avoid some painful and expensive learning curve that other companies have faced,” he added.
(Sourced from The Hindu Businessline.)
admin
January 27, 2014
Sadhana
Chathurvedula, MINT
Bengaluru, 27 January 2016
When graduate student Anupama Pasumarthy shops online, she says she is always disappointed by the recommendations.
“It’s tough finding clothes (which are always too large) or shoes (which are too small) in my size, and I don’t find stuff that’s similar. I used to shop online but these days I just go to the store when I want to buy something,” the 22-year-old says.
Tech-savvy millennials like Pasumarthy are the demographic that most fashion retailers target, but the problems she faces are all too familiar for anyone who shops online. To help retailers overcome this, start-ups like Stylumia Intelligence Technology Pvt Ltd, which offer artificial intelligence-based solutions for smart visual recommendations, have started to take off.
There are multiple start-ups globally trying to crack visual search. Visual search start-ups help companies enable their users to discover products online, based on photos of objects in the real world. In India, companies like iLenze (which raised $500,000 in funding last year) and SnapShopr (which raised an undisclosed amount of angel funding) offer visual search platforms.
Chennai-based Mad Street Den, which raised $1.5 million in 2015, also offers visual search, but its most used offering is a visual-recommendation engine, which sifts through catalogue data to show relevant recommendations to users.
With e-commerce booming in India, Singapore-based Visenze, whose visual search offering is used by companies like Flipkart, is setting up operations in India to cater to the demand.
Many visual search companies cater to multiple verticals, and have so far concentrated on consumer applications.
Started by former chief operating officer of Myntra, Ganesh Subramanian, and machine learning scientist Ram Prakash, who developed Quillpad, the first machine learning based language input for Indian languages, Stylumia is different. It focuses only on fashion, and using the same core technology, it is looking to help both consumers and businesses make data-driven decisions.
“We are developing a technology which takes natural images, videos, be it Bollywood videos or TV serials, whatever influences fashion, and decipher and extract fashion elements from that,” says Prakash.
The start-up then hopes to use this derived intelligence in two ways – one, to make smarter recommendations to consumers browsing for products and two, to give suggestions to fashion buyers and retailers what to buy and make, based on real world consumer-purchasing data.
Right now, Prakash says that decisions at fashion companies are made based on some analytics, but intelligence based on visual cues is missing.
“They look at the patterns and say this is doing well because this is a red colour T-shirt with a contrast collar, what they cannot do right now is look at the same red colour T-shirts with contrast collars which are not doing well. They do not have a way to see all the relevant data together. That’s another problem that we are trying to solve,” says Prakash.
Stylumia is set to launch its product in the first week of April. It currently has partnerships with retailers (which they it does not want to disclose before the product launch), says chief executive officer Subramanian. For now, it is using a team of four engineers to capture and label data but hope to automate this process very soon.
“There’s a lot of interest among both online and offline retailers in this space. Our aim is to provide the most accurate prediction of demand and our consistency will improve as we work with more retailers and brands and get more and more data,” says Subramanian.
Despite the progress in technology, unless there is an overhaul on the supply-chain side, real impact is difficult to create, says Devangshu Dutta, chief executive officer, Third Eyesight, a New Delhi-based consulting firm.
“Large retailers today are planning several months in advance and are structured in such a way that by and large it takes them several months to respond to any particular trend. Till you can address that, data is just data,” he said.
(Published in Mint)