| |
W(H)ITHER B2Bs?
(Press Quote from CIO) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Read this article to
- Know how B2B are changing the e-commerce landscape
- Understand the intricacies in B2B strategies
- Be aware of what organizations should do to succeed in the
marketplace
Do B2B have a future, or are they bubbles waiting to burst?
While the media and researchers offer conflicting views on this,
without a doubt the dotcom bust has bust taken the sheen off
net-based business models. New players are now treating a cautious
path. But B2Bs are definitely here to stay. What should the
players do to remain in the game?
The press does play favorite…. sometimes! Dotcom obituaries
have given way to essays on B2Bs. Hardly a day passes when our
senses are not impinged with B2B strategies, success stories,
disintermediation and the impending B2B doom (or boom). Consider
what various research and consultant groups have to say.
- Money spent on B2B transactions already surpasses consumer
transactions 10-1 (Aberdeen Group)
- B2B is estimated to become a $2. 7 trillion worldwide industry
by 2004 (Forester Research)
- Indian has the potential to earn revenues from e-business
solutions worth $ 10 billion by 2008 (Nasscom-McKinsey study
1999).
At the same time, we hear rumors of Ariba closing down operations
in India, stock prices of major B2B solutions providers plummeting
and net-based companies incurring quarterly losses. More recently,
the Gartner Group has predicted a bloodbath in the Asian B2B
segment, when ninety per cent of the existing B2B (in Asia alone)
will perish.
Businesses have been communicating with each other since the
beginning. What has changed, however, is the technology that
carries the communication, from pigeons to mail to fax to EDI…and
now to communication via the internet. This has opened vistas
of opportunity like never before.
Classifying B2B marketplaces on the basis of mutually exclusive
categories can be erroneous because newer models of B2B are
still evolving, and there is much overlapping in the types
of transactions and services rendered in different marketplaces.
Nevertheless, B2B companies can broadly be categorized on
the basis of nature of ownership, types of transactions and
services rendered. They can be private or public, horizontal
or vertical, infomediaries, procurement exchanges, brokering
sites and third-party marketplaces.
Indian scenario
In India, through the exposure to B2B marketplace is still
limited, we do have all types of companies. "Apart from
the PC penetration in India being lower than other parts of
the world, the trends are the same in terms of services and
functionality provided by B2B companies," Says Devangshu
Dutta, Director, LinkApparel, that not only links buyers and
sellers of apparel industries but also provides them supply
chain optimization and other value added services.
In India a large number of B2B portals provide simple catalogue
services-providing information on the availability of items
to buyers and suppliers, thus acting as infomediaries. They
basically provide a matchmaking platform between buyers and
sellers, with services like Request of Quotation (RFQ), free
listing, queries, etc., with little or no auction services.
Then there are companies that provide multiple bids auctions,
reverse auctions and managed auction services like SteelRX.com
and LinkApparel.
There is also an emerging trend of large players in a particular
industry segment coming together to form a private exchange.
This has happened more in the steel (metaljunction.com - a collaborative
effort on the part of SAIL, Kalyani and TATA) and automotive
sectors. We also have examples of large companies having created
private B2B exchanges for transaction between their own suppliers
and dealers, like LG Electronics and Samsung, for instance.
India also has the advantage of the presence of global B2B
solutions giants like Sesame, Ariba, and Commerce One. "We are
consciously bullish about the Indian market. India has big IT
and healthcare companies, and its telecom sector is exploding.
"The economy is doing well and all this presents very good business
prospects for B2B solutions," avers Seetoh Hon Chew, COO, Sesami
Inc.
Emerging trends
The dotcom bust has brought to the fore the disadvantages
of a purely net-based business model. "A 'click-n-mortar'
approach is being adopted as market realities have made the
players realize that it is important to service the customer
from a physical location," says Rishi Sahai, Investment Principal,
Infinity Venture Fund, a VC firm that has invested in many
B2B startups. "Complete online strategy is not possible in
the near future even in technologically advanced countries
like the U.S. For this every segment in the value chain should
be able to communicate with each other," contends Anurag Saraf,
CEO, SteelRX, a B2B marketplace for the steel industry. "We
have a very strong offline model, with representatives in
six cities who are in constants touch with the customers,
" he says.
"It is becoming increasingly apparent that there is little
value in just moving transactions online, " feels Asutosh
Padhi, Associate Principal, McKinsey, who tracks B2B trends
worldwide. "Real economic benefits from B2Bs lie in services
around transactions, that enable 'real world' reductions in
coordination and processing costs, cycle times and inventory
levels," he asserts. He foresees broad-ranging alliances between
technology players and providers of real-world services such
as quality assurance, logistics and payments.
Double-edged sword
Unlike B2Cs, B2Bs are better-evolved; the technology is more
sophisticated and entry barriers are great. Critical mass is
achieved with greater difficulty and business models are more
defensible. "The threat is of several players with inadequate
experience tying to attack crowded vertical with similar value
propositions. Eventually such players will head towards bankruptcy,"
asserts Sahai.
"In India, like anywhere else in the world, when a
hype is created everybody rushes to it as if it was gold, but
only the serious players who understand the market dynamics
will get through," emphasizes Dutta. "There are a lot of me-too
and look-alike companies proliferating. So one has to either
be unique or very strong - in terms of money and the relationships
with buyers and sellers - to survive," he says.
For Rakesh Bhatnagar, CEO, Net4barter.com the biggest threat
is attitude. "People spends so foolishly and assume so freely
without practicality, that the whole business model goes away.
We have to keep in mind that like in offline businesses even
B2B need some gestation period." |
|
| |
| On the future opportunities
for B2Bs, Sahai shoots a typical VC proposition. "The
numbers are compelling. The market will be $2.7 trillion
(according to Forrester Research) by 2004 ($1.4 trillion
if you exclude extranets). If the B2B marketplaces make
even one per cent of this as transaction fees, then revenues
would amount to $27 billion. On an average if 50 vertical
emerge out of the chaos, and if two competitors emerge
per vertical, then revenues would still be $270 million
each." |
|
Unlike B2Cs, B2Bs are better-evolved; the technology is
more sophisticated and entry barriers are greater |
|
|
| |
In effect there is tremendous opportunity for companies,
and huge growth potential. Padhi agrees with this observation
and feels that the crux of the whole matter is who is going
to capture the real value first. The greatest opportunity
these exchanges offer is for the existing companies, as it
will not only significantly improve their performance - since
in India supply chains are highly inefficient and fragmented
- but also help companies in significant 'supply consolidation'.
Large suppliers will gain from B2B initiatives.
"It is the SME segment that has gained the most from B2B
initiatives. SMEs have not only expanded their business reach
across India but are actually generating revenues from it,"
says Brijesh Agrawal, CTO, Indiamart.com, an online marketplace
that focuses on the SME segment.
Benefits: Are they for real?
|
|
| |
Industry players believe
that the introduction of e-commerce and online exchanges
have definitely brought about benefits in more ways than
one. Apart from the lower running costs, many feel that
there is better coordination between upstream and downstream
operations along the supply chain. There is also greater
transparency when it comes to price, even for equipment
and services. With increased ability to track inventory,
companies can now reduce their minimum inventory levels,
thus saving storage costs. Dutta feels that even achieving
just the right inventory levels can bring additional profit
margins rather than only cost savings. B2Bs have also
expanded in an unprecedented manner, enabling the market
reach of both buyers and sellers, even making price negotiations
(auctions, discussions, RFQ/REP, etc.) from remote locations
distinctly possible.
|
|
B2B is a new concept. People have to be educated, money
invested and infrastructure built. But, promises about
B2Bs are definitely not overstated. |
|
|
| |
Sanjeev Bhat, CEO, Radico Export and Import
Ltd., which is listed with indiamart.com claims to have closed
orders through Indiamart worth $100,000 since 1997. "The same
orders that took us 30 days to close, we now close within 48 hours,"
he informs. However, Vimal Bhatia, proprietor of Achal Bhatia
& Sons, a company dealing in medical equipment has had a very
bad B2B transaction experience, "I sent goods worth $5,000 to
a U.S.-based firm and never got paid." The greatest disadvantage
of the internet business model is that one can't simply trust
the other party. There are fly-by-night- operators lurching
on the net to fleece gullible suppliers. "An intermediary could
have simply averted the whole episode," adds Bhatia. Padhi considers
the potential benefits of B2Bs to be underestimated. "It is
just a matter of time. People expect miracles out of IT systems,
but there is a lead-time involved in terms of new technology
adoption. To get the benefits, the entire eco-system the company
works in, has to embrace the technology and that takes time,"
adds Padhi.
Disintermediation: Myth or reality? |
|
| |
Industry players believe
that the introduction of e-commerce and online exchanges
have definitely brought about benefits in more ways than
one. Apart from the lower running costs, many feel that
there is better coordination between upstream and downstream
operations along the supply chain. There is also greater
transparency when it comes to price, even for equipment
and services. With increased ability to track inventory,
companies can now reduce their minimum inventory levels,
thus saving storage costs. Dutta feels that even achieving
just the right inventory levels can bring additional profit
margins rather than only cost savings. B2Bs have also
expanded in an unprecedented manner, enabling the market
reach of both buyers and sellers, even making price negotiations
(auctions, discussions, RFQ/REP, etc.) from remote locations
distinctly possible.
|
|
Winning B2Bs
- Backed by existing players i.e. incumbents
- Business model should be something more than pure
procurement only model
- Revenue model has to be focused towards value added
service
- Incumbents have to agree to a governance model that
makes it a separate profit-making company.
|
|
|
| |
"Disintermediation will surely happen as far as brokering
of information is concerned. Traditional agents and dalals
feeding on the opacity of the whole transaction will surely
move out," points out Kumud Goel, MD, KLG Systel, which has
created a B2B marketplace for the construction industry. Padhi
considers disintermediation unlikely, and points out that
in many industries intermediaries play a very valid role their
function much beyond mere match making, such as credit risk,
providing finance, holding inventories, etc. It might happen
in some small industries but that is not going to be a general
trend. "What will happen is that the lower order intermediaries
will evolve quite substantially and they will focus on the
higher value-added activities", says Padhi.
Integrating SCM and CRM
ERP transformed the entire transaction processes internal to
the organization. But B2B is everything that happens outside
the organization, whether on the supplier side or the customer
side. Given this split, companies have the option of implementing
their own independent SCM and CRM solutions. In Padhi's view,
more companies will go for independent CRM solutions, since
there is a perceived risk that data needs to be proprietary
and therefore needs to be kept within the company. On the supply
side, companies will collaborate to create standard solutions,
since each supplier supplies to many buyers. If buyers are offered
different supply chain solutions in the same industry, it becomes
difficult for the suppliers to participate in a meaningful way
in the process.
"There is a strong need for developing a set of supply chain
standards, with some basic definition of what purchase order,
inventory information, etc. are," states Padhi.
For Dutta the key to SCM in a B2B environment is "active collaboration"
between organizations in all the processes, right from product
development to order management. Saraf feels that SCM and CRM
integration is a prerequisite for a wired world.
Logistics bete noire
Generally speaking, logistics involve an entire gamut of things
- sourcing requirements, inventory management, demand estimation,
order tracking, delivery logistics, etc. "Optimal logistics
demand that the right quantity of the right product reach the
right place at the right time," says Bhatnagar.
|
|
| |
| COMPARATIVE B2B
SCENARIO : INDIA AND U.S. |
| Parameters |
India |
U. S. |
| SCM |
Inefficient |
Efficient |
| Procurements (Focus) |
Direct Goods |
Indirect goods |
| E-biz Infrastructure (Legal, regulatory) |
Developing |
Well-established |
| Logistics |
Weak |
Strong |
|
|
| |
Apart from the main logistics bottlenecks
in India like truck strikes and transportation delays, there is
no efficient system like a common information platform where one
can access the stocks or status of delivery.
"Problems of logistics are real. Creating an infomediary is
not going to help. It is not only the information which constraints
the valuechain, but also the infrastructure supporting and enabling
it," says Dutta.
CIOs' strategy
The emerging B2B scenario will pose many challenges to CIOs.
What should be their strategies and priorities? Padhi feels
that the generalization of the role of CIOs will be difficult,
but feels CIOs will have three options: first, to setup their
own IT systems and get their own packages; second, to join independent
exchanges; and third, to get along with other industry players
and form their own private exchange. "CIOs should carefully
analyze the benefits of each of the options in terms of time
and cost savings, standardization, before taking a decision,"
contends Padhi.
For Dutta the strategy is "do not go by fads". (Read Dr. Milind
Oka's series in CIO Enterprise) Companies need to identify the
critical areas of the business, for only an honest assessment
vis-a-vis competition will serve as a global benchmark.
Roadblocks
The roadblocks for any new concept are not confined only to
infrastructural areas. They also have a lot of psychological
implications. B2Bs are no exception.
Speed, connectivity, absence of proper payment gateways and
bandwidth are its main adversaries. Bhatnagar feels that security
is also a major issue. "There is a psychological discomfort
when it comes to payment through the net," he says. However,
for him, infrastructure is a non-issue. "If you create a solution
which is resource hungry and bandwidth hungry then you have
a problem. So you need to create an environment that is compatible
to Indian systems," he asserts.
For Dutta the biggest issue is mindset; that is, creating
the right mental framework for adoption of the system. Fear
of what is going to happen in future in the light of economic
slowdown and globalization, uncertainty in terms of policy adoption,
and doubt in terms of success of the policy are the major factors
that impede e-commerce transactions.
For Padhi, huge investments in supplier upgradation programmes
and the absence of regulatory infrastructure are the major
bottlenecks. Saraf does not consider security as a big issue
since most of the transactions are done offline. "For basic
security concerns there are standard solutions that are used
worldwide," he contends.
The future
Gartner Group's forecast coupled with Cassandra's prophecy
about the impending B2B doom has put a question mark on the
future course that B2Bs are more at a conceptual and trial
stage not only in India but also in the U.S., which makes
large-scale B2B transactions look like a distant dream.
"In India government sectors are yet to take the initiative
for B2B commerce. And since the government is the biggest buyer
in many sectors, the private players will not be able to sell
anything to them online," muses Goel. |
|
| |
"People are expecting
too much too soon," quips Saraf, adding that it was like
sowing a seed and expecting fruits even before the sapling
has sprouted. "It is a very new concept and people have
to be educated, money invested in new technology, and
infrastructure built. B2B's promises are definitely not
overstated," he says.
|
|
Like offline businesses even B2Bs need some gestation
period |
|
|
| |
Padhi sees the B2B future primarily in two
forms: as consortium-driven exchanges and e-nablement of different
functions within the companies.
Hype or no hype, B2Bs are here to stay, but the future will
see many obituaries written about players jumping onto the B2B
wagon without getting their basics right.
By Satyapriya Verma, Senior Correspondent with TMG.
(Courtesy: CIO India).
This is an extract of an article published in CIO, July 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|